You have probably seen him (and his red braces) on GMTV, The BBC News
or Working Lunch and now you can hear from him here, on the FMB Money
Maze.FMB works closely with Justin and his company Seven Investment
Management Ltd and every week we are giving you the opportunity to gain an
insight into what is going on in the world economy when Justin will
share his news and views in his weekly market commentary. Not only
will he have you clutching your sides but you might actually learn
something as well!
|
Weekly Update - 23 July 2010 |
So who is Frank Dodd?
Forget Frank Dodd, it is in fact Dodd Frank that we
should remember. Chris Dodd is the
chairman of the US Senate banking committee, and Barney Frank (who
should be a cartoon character, surely) is chairman of the House (of
Representatives) financial services committee. These are, if not the
authors, then certainly the names responsible for the new US
financial regulation bill. So why should we care? Well to start with
what happens over there will at least ripple over to our financial
world and of course our own financial services regulatory structure
is about to undergo a major overhaul and reform.
The very mention of regulation normally induces an
automated yawn for many, but in fact it is probably the most vital
issue for all of us as participants or customers to ensure that we
have a trustworthy, reliable and sound investment and banking
industry. It affects us all. It will be especially interesting to
see if our initiatives take a similar route and remember that
regulation is not a form filling bureaucratic exercise, but would
focus more on supervision which works as part of the industry itself
to help it develop and provide suitable facilities in a controlled
and risk measured manner.
The US plans can be best described in five key
areas:-
-
Consumer protection. A new Consumer
Financial Protection Bureau will be established within the
Federal Reserve. It would aim to tackle miss-selling of credit
cards, loans and mortgages, the last part of which lay at the
core of the original housing loans problems.
-
Derivatives. In order to improve
transparency and risk control they will ensure that
settlement for such contacts are cleared through central
clearing houses. At least then in theory you could have a better
oversight over the amount of risk being taken on by
counterparties. Additionally the banks would have to divest
themselves of their derivatives trading businesses.
-
Resolution authority. Effectively this
will allow the authorities to step in to seize and control any
organisation and even wind it up if it is facing impending
failure. This then manages the Lehman-type events and would more
effectively manage any such impact to avoid an industry wide
catastrophe.
-
Systemic risk regulation. Here a
Financial Stability Oversight Council of regulators would be
established and be chaired by the Treasury Secretary. This would
have the task of identifying systemic risks to the industry and
particular participants and even require ‘living wills’ from
those that might be considered at most risk to ensure that they
could be managed down if necessary.
-
The Volker Rule. Yes the Prince of
Darkness (no, not Peter Mandelson) Paul Volker, the ex-head of
the Fed before Alan Greenspan, seems to have had his way and had
agreed that deposit taking banks shall no longer be involved
their own proprietary trading (prop desks) and be limited to
only small holdings of hedge funds.
These are very significant changes and will have
some quite dramatic impacts on certain banks that have for many
years built up their prop desks as very useful back door profit
centres away from their normal public role of normal lending
facilities. These should now be regarded as separate businesses -
and after all, get banks back to what they are supposed to be doing
- providing financial services to their clients, not to themselves.
***
And finally... Boulder, Colorado, USA. Tragic news from the
States as we hear that the days when a citizen could address their
local Council wearing only underwear may be over. The Boulder City
council will vote on new decorum rules in September, seven months
after a resident stepped up to a microphone in his boxers.
The rules were already under review (in fact very close scrutiny)
but that incident led to a
proposed ban on undressing during meetings.
It's not the first time the university town has wrestled with how
much clothing is enough. In April, the city barred teens and adults
from showing their genitals in public. That could put the wraps on
two annual traditions that involve running or cycling naked. But the
council declined to outlaw topless females, despite complaints about
a woman who gardens in a thong and gloves. Yet more of our freedoms
being taken away - especially with the secateurs(!)
I am off to Sri Lanka for a few weeks having not been there for
thirty years when the fighting first started on that unfortunate
island. In the meantime my most talented colleague Aparna Ram has
kindly agreed to take my place. Have a lovely Summer.
Justin A. Urquhart Stewart
Director
Seven Investment Management Limited
For
previous editions of our Weekly Update, please click here
This article represents a personal and
light-hearted
view from Director, Justin Urquhart Stewart of Seven Investment
Management Limited, and is based on current financial news and events
around the world. Its content should not be used for investment
purposes and you should contact an independent financial adviser
before making any investment or financial decision. Seven Investment
Management Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial
Services Authority. Member of the London Stock Exchange. Head office:
23 Austin Friars, London EC2N 2QP. Telephone 020 7760 8777. Registered
in England and Wales number 4092911. Registered office: 3 More London
Riverside, London SE1 2AQ.
|