|
Weekly Update - 6 June 2008 |
Of Heroes and Villains...
So England's pouting multi-millionaire
football stars - the ones who didn't want to let something as
trivial as the European Championships interfere with their Summer
holiday plans - lined up at Wembley and swept the mighty football
powerhouse, the USA, off the pitch by a stunning margin of 2:0. Oh, to
live in the shadows of such heroes...
Sadly, if one looks at the state of the
country, this seems to fit into the general landscape. There
appears to be certain quotations which keep rising to the surface and
one of them is from Warren Buffett, the Sage of Omaha, and the world's
richest man who coined that wonderful phrase that it's only when the
tide goes out that one learns who has been swimming naked. It is not
the first time that we have used this but as the economic boom of the
past years draws to a close, there are evermore situations emerging to
which it is the most apt analogy. Prime Minister Brown is probably at
this moment charging around the upper floors of Number 10 looking for
his Speedos.
Up and down the country in all the media, in
the pubs and on the terraces - though not in Austria and Switzerland -
all the talk is of falling house prices. The fact is that this
in itself is not a bad thing. As all investors know, the desirability
of a rising market is merely a question of whether one has money
invested or money to invest. Likewise, the opportunities in falling
house prices are enormous, especially for the young and the less well
off who have watched the dream of their own home vanish further and
further into the distance over the past few years. The problem is not
in the price of houses; it is in the amount of debt that has been
raised against the asset. Negative equity is rearing its ugly head
again - the spectre of the mortgage loan being higher than the value
of the property used to secure it. Traditional repayment mortgages saw
to it that every month a small part of the capital debt was repaid -
and after twenty five years, all things being equal, the house owner
actually owned the house having, as it used to be said, paid for
another row of bricks every month.
House prices would never have risen so far if
buyers had not been prepared to perform ever more sophisticated
mortgage exercises in order to pay for that 'des res'. - and
the banks had not assisted by willingly making such loans available.
The poisonous misconception was that equity in a house is created by a
rising value, not by repaying the loan. Thus, when the property market
turns south that very assumption finds itself wearing the Emperor's
new set of swimming shorts.
Over the past decades there has been a sea
change in the attitude of of the average household to debt.
Think of Charles Dickens' world with work houses and debtors' gaols.
Debt was the one thing you didn't want to get into and the one
objective in every two-point-four-child-one-car-one-dog household was
to repay the mortgage. One borrowed to bridge. The concept of holding
debt as a fixed portion of balance sheet, so to speak, was for
companies, not for families. Sure, the poorest members of society
always found themselves in financial trouble but the Welfare State was
established precisely to be there as a safety net for these, the
weakest and most vulnerable. The others were supposedly smart enough
and capable enough of looking after themselves. Much of that key
assumption with respect to joined up thinking now looks to be in
trouble as our society appears to be prepared to treat persistent debt
as an acceptable feature of everyday life, in many cases without the
discipline to manage domestic leverage sensibly.
One of the catchphrases of the 1960's was
"the permissive society". At the time it referred to sexual
liberation. We still appear to have a permissive environment but it is
now one which no longer stigmatises indebtedness or, perhaps more
accurately, divesting capital for consumption by people who are still
earning income - the notion that you accumulate assets until
retirement and then slowly sell them down in order to fund the cost of
living has faded away. The very thought of taking equity out of one's
house at an early age was anathema but the concept of what has become
known as "using one's house as a cash point" was born.
Britain was in an upward spiral of rising
house prices, rising consumption and a buoyant wealth effect.
Into this came Chancellor Brown who gently but consistently tightened
the tax screw and like the rest of the nation spent it on consumption
and not investment. Where is the transport infrastructure? Where are
the centres of excellence? Where are the engineers? Although public
services add to GDP, they do not create value added. It's a bit like
trying to convince one's self that buying a new car is a capital
investment. When the main contributor to fiscal revenues is
consumption tax, be that in the form of VAT, Stamp Duty or Excise
duties one becomes a soldier of fortune. When the spending stops, so
do fiscal revenues.
In the past months the house price carousel
has not only ground to a halt but gone into reverse and the feel-good
factor has evaporated faster than a politician can submit an expense
claim. The Nationwide House Price Index fell 2.5% in May alone
taking it to
-4.4% for the year. The GfK Consumer Confidence Survey came in at -29,
its lowest reading since November 1990. Free drinks for anyone who can
spot Mr Brown's balloon inscribed "I have abolished the boom and bust
cycles" flying past attached to a pig.
All the while, as the banks suffer,
corporation tax contributions from the City are falling off a cliff.
Just when the former Chancellor needs money to spend in order
to help bridge the downturn in the economy, he also discovers that the
credit cards are fully loaded and that the small mortgage becomes a
big mortgage when the value of the house goes down.
Looking back, the Brown years at the Treasury
do look as though their trumpeted success is a bit like celebrating
that crushing defeat imposes by the Wembley heroes on our
transatlantic cousins. To be sure, the global economic
environment has deteriorated significantly in the past year or so - in
the USA, the precipitous fall of the housing market began in January
2006 - but the government rode the wave of global growth while
behaving as though the boom was all of its own making. Now it is
trying to palm the blame for the downturn off on external forces. In
doing so it has embarrassed itself and its level of credibility was
demonstrated in the Crewe and Nantwich by-election.
Abraham Lincoln said that you can fool all of
the people for some of the time and some of the people for all of the
time but that you can't fool all of the people for all of the time.
Democracy has given us the means to remove governments which get ahead
of themselves on that front. However, sadly it looks as though some of
the people are being found to be guilty of having fooled themselves.
Looking Ahead
Central Bank Watch:
Monet markets have been pricing in further rate cuts, going forward.
However, in the past few weeks this has been reversed and higher or
unchanged rates are now being discounted. This is reflected in renewed
stress in equity and bond markets. Central Bank watchers are on full
alert and markets will swing with any change in sentiment.
Commodities:
Reports are that speculators and hedge funds are exiting rather than
entering commodity markets. Meanwhile there is, nevertheless,
increasing pressure on regulators around the world to limit the
activity of speculators on the commodity exchanges and first proposals
should be made public before long.
Real Estate:
Both in the UK and the USA there is little sign of the recovery being
"just around the corner" in the residential property market - on the
contrary - it looks as though the UK is just beginning its correction.
However, the proportion of non-conforming mortgage loans is lower than
its sub prime counterpart in the USA. Watch for ongoing reports.
For
previous editions of our Weekly Update, please click here
This article represents a personal and
light-hearted
view from Director, Justin Urquhart Stewart of Seven Investment
Management Limited, and is based on current financial news and events
around the world. Its content should not be used for investment
purposes and you should contact an independent financial adviser
before making any investment or financial decision. Seven Investment
Management Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial
Services Authority. Member of the London Stock Exchange. Head office:
23 Austin Friars, London EC2N 2QP. Telephone 020 7760 8777. Registered
in England and Wales number 4092911. Registered office: 3 More London
Riverside, London SE1 2AQ.
|