|
Weekly Update - 16 May 2008 |
Currency Conundrums
So the Dollar is doomed? Despite the recent rally, if you were to
believe by far and away the majority of commentaries one could easily
assume that the great greenback is doomed to yet further falls. Well
against certain currencies that in fact might be the case, and
research from Goldman Sachs especially highlights the currencies of
Singapore, Malaysia and China as such candidates. This seems to relate
to inflationary pressures being translated into currency strength. The
report differentiates between “good”
inflation and “bad”.
“Good” inflation stories come about where central banks have kept
currencies undervalued for an extended period of time. This typically
leads to the growth of both a significant current account and balance
of payments surplus, a build up of reserves and a high increase in
money supply. When inflation pressures do arise therefore, as we are
seeing especially in relation to food prices, one easier way of
releasing such pressure is to allow the currency to strengthen.
On the other side of the coin, “bad” inflation occurs when a
currency is already overvalued and then there are options for economic
planners. Under these circumstances, consumers could be sucking in
further goods and both the current account deficit and balance of
payments could widen - so the imbalances could worsen. The choices for
the policy makers could then be to fight this bad inflation with
tighter fiscal and monetary policies in order to slow domestic demand
- thus such actions could be both painful and
unpopular.
However, there may be one currency which may in fact show weakness
against the Dollar, namely Sterling. The recent comments from Governor
of the Bank of England were painful and honest - probably too painful
for the Chancellor to listen to. A decade of growth based on cheap
money and easy debt is coming to an end. The consumer, which as I have
mentioned before is 50% of our economy, is being severely squeezed
with an appalling figure of 30% of salaries going on servicing overall
debt (mortgages, loans, credit cards etc.) During the last recession
in 1992 the figure for servicing mortgage repayments reached 26.7%.
Equally, government debt has been rising and must surely break
through the 40% (as a percentage of GDP) measure of control as set by
the Prime Minister in his days as Chancellor. What I don’t understand
is that in all the interviews I have yet to hear anyone ask him about
his famed “cycle” and that this is the time when he should have the
extra reserves being built up ready to help us through the downturn.
Well he hasn’t and there aren’t any reserves! I think the rhyming
slang is “pants on fire”.
***
I was asked by the BBC to do a very short broadcast for the World
Service on the confusing world and history of short selling. I thought
that this might make a good opportunity to add such an explanation
here.
Despite the jargon the definition of short selling is in fact quite
simple - all you are doing is borrowing a share or commodity from a
broker with the aim of profiting from its hoped-for price movement.
This is effected by immediately selling it, on the understanding that
it will be bought back at hopefully at a lower price and returned to
the broker. So if you sold it at £100 and bought it back at £80 - you
have just made £20 profit.
However, not unexpectedly, this practice has caused a lot of ire
and frustration as for some as it was just seen to encourage
speculation. This grew to such an extent that it was even banned for a
while in London in the 18th century.
Going back even earlier the practice was often cited as being one
of the causes of the great Tulip Disaster in the Netherlands 1637.
Astonishingly at that time there was a huge demand for the rare and
precious tulip bulb that had recently been imported from Turkey. A
speculative frenzy developed throughout 1636 and the prices for tulip
bulbs rocketed until finally the bubble burst the following year,
ruining many.
What made the bubble burst may never be fully known, but the
speculative practice of selling what you did not own effectively
forced the price down and was blamed as a key contributory factor.
However, not all is so negative about the practice. In 1949 Alfred
Winslow Jones adopted it to help him run his portfolios, where he
would hedge or protect his investments - this was the birth of the
first hedge funds that we are now so familiar with, where short
selling is so important.
More recently there have been examples of investors making large
sums out of shorting Northern Rock shares and, more controversially,
some have alleged that short selling raids may recently have taken
place on banks including HBOS in the UK.
So whether you approve or not they certainly can be vital tool for
the professional investor - but like all tools they can be used for
both good and ill.
***
And finally……….just to ensure that we are all focussed on the
equality of the roles of our partners, I note that it has been
recorded that women carry out on average over 215 miles of ironing in
their lifetime.
Men apparently can only manage 73 miles. This can either mean that
us males have become increasingly lazy – or, more worryingly, our
anticipated lifespan has just been dramatically reduced.
Have a good weekend,
Justin A. Urquhart Stewart
Director
Seven Investment Management Limited
For
previous editions of our Weekly Update, please click here
This article represents a personal and lighthearted
view from Director, Justin Urquhart Stewart of Seven Investment
Management Limited, and is based on current financial news and events
around the world. Its content should not be used for investment
purposes and you should contact an independent financial adviser
before making any investment or financial decision. Seven Investment
Management Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial
Services Authority. Member of the London Stock Exchange. Head office:
23 Austin Friars, London EC2N 2QP. Telephone 020 7760 8777. Registered
in England and Wales number 4092911. Registered office: 3 More London
Riverside, London SE1 2AQ.
|