|
Weekly Update - 18 July 2008 |
Emerging and Submerging
From 1996 to 2000, with the honourable exception of 1999, the asset
class of Emerging Market Equities was one of the worst performers,
competing only with Gold, Commodities and Japanese equities for the
title of ‘Dog of the Year’. Yet less than a decade later that same
asset class has been continually fêted as the sure fire success for
all investors. The emerging economies have been, and certainly will
be, most
important to the global economy but that does not mean that they
develop in a straight and rising trajectory. In fact their development
is likely to be extremely erratic.
Over more recent years the marketing hype has gathered pace and the
acronym of BRIC has become common parlance amongst investors of all
sizes. These initials, as many will know, refer to Brazil, Russia,
India and China as the largest of the emerging market economies. This
acronym has been applied liberally to a wide range of investment
structures to such an extent that many seem not to look behind the
title, but take it as a given that such investments are an assured
success. When blind investment greed and
stupidity take over it is usually time to sell.
I mentioned a few weeks ago the malaise of the Vietnamese market
and its economy and it has been a good illustration for what has been
occurring since then. In fact it would seem that this has reached such
a stage that investors are leaving the sector to return to the hardly
calm area of US shares. The fear has been the issue of inflation and
with that the effect of rising interest rates which may well dampen
local domestic demand and leave the economies looking more stagnant.
With the falling Dollar putting more inflationary pressure
particularly on those countries who peg their currency to it,
investors have turned to see the weaker US currency as an opportunity
to buy US stocks and shares cheaply.
In Asia, many companies have been generally seen as in relatively
fine fettle, however the growing pressure of commodity costs will
start to take its toll on margins. As the inflationary wave comes
through, so the central bankers have been raising rates which impacts
on borrowing and funding costs - all adding to the braking effect on
these nations’ economies.
The effects are clear to see and last week the fall in the
Pakistani market values saw the ransacking of the stock exchanges in
Lahore, Islamabad and Karachi. After a seven year rising bull market,
new investors there were unused to the fact that stocks do go down as
well as up. The effect of a 35% drop since April 21st has been
painful, especially to a nation in such political turmoil.
Last week even China’s growth was finally shown to be slowing as
weaker exports pulled back growth to a mere 10.1% from 11.9%, which is
the slowest since 2005. This is still a superb growth rate and good
news for the global economy but tougher for the Chinese authorities
revealing some potentially unpleasant issues such as excess capacity -
and with that the pressure on jobs and the possibility of further
social
unrest.
Is this, then, the end of the emerging market dream? Certainly not,
but probably a return to far more realistic valuations and will lead
to the opportunity for reinvestment into these key areas in due
course. Let the inflation wave with all its consequent effects pass
through and then the opportunities will resurface. But not yet.
***
Not all banks are the same - thank heaven. Despite their herd‐like
mentality, some, either by luck, good judgement or even effective
regulation, have not been covered in the subprime blancmange
splattered over so many last year. Wells Fargo produced what seemed to
be wonderfully clean and encouraging figures and Santander have been
able to bid for Alliance and Leicester as they too, courtesy of the
Spanish authorities, have remained unsullied. The others still are
having to clean their stables, with the Merrill
Lynch write-off figure now topping $40 billion. In the UK the
underwriters are going to have to try and absorb the wash of unwanted
stock from HBOS and in due course the unappealing Bradford and Bingley
offer - I noted that this organisation rented the Sheffield Arena with
a capacity of 12,000 people for its EGM. Always good to be prepared in
case of a rush - actually 56 people turned up, plus 22 security
guards. The Executive Chairman, Mr Kent, when commenting on the events
running up to the meeting, said “A
shambles is unfair because that implies incompetence”. Yup, spot on.
And finally.......there is something about Yorkshire binmen. After
having had their trucks fitted with Satnavs in case they get lost
(bless), letters have been sent to residents of Craven in North
Yorkshire asking them to partially empty their bins as the binmen
don’t want to run the risk of straining their backs. There is another
answer - find another job.
***
P.S. It was good to see Sooty celebrating his 60th
birthday this week. I suspect he will be the one person I know who
will be celebrating the bear market.
***
Have a good weekend,
Justin A. Urquhart Stewart
Director
Seven Investment Management Limited
For
previous editions of our Weekly Update, please click here
This article represents a personal and
light-hearted
view from Director, Justin Urquhart Stewart of Seven Investment
Management Limited, and is based on current financial news and events
around the world. Its content should not be used for investment
purposes and you should contact an independent financial adviser
before making any investment or financial decision. Seven Investment
Management Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial
Services Authority. Member of the London Stock Exchange. Head office:
23 Austin Friars, London EC2N 2QP. Telephone 020 7760 8777. Registered
in England and Wales number 4092911. Registered office: 3 More London
Riverside, London SE1 2AQ.
|